Blog

STEC (E. coli O157 & non-O157) in Leafy Greens: Why Incidents Keep Rising

Written by SGS Digicomply Editorial Team | Jan 6, 2026 11:15:00 PM

Food safety professionals are not surprised anymore when leafy greens appear at the center of STEC alerts. What is changing, however, is how consistently and persistently these incidents are being reported—and how often they escalate into recalls and regulatory actions rather than remaining isolated findings.

The incident trend for STEC (Shiga toxin–producing E. coli, including O157 and non-O157 strains) linked to leafy greens shows a steady upward trajectory, not a short-term spike. This matters, because it suggests structural risk rather than episodic failure.

What STEC Is — and Why Leafy Greens Are a Perfect Vehicle

STEC are pathogenic E. coli strains capable of producing Shiga toxins, which can cause severe illness even at very low infectious doses. While O157:H7 remains the most well-known strain, non-O157 STEC are increasingly detected and regulated, especially in North America and Europe.

Leafy greens—such as romaine, spinach, mixed salad leaves, and ready-to-eat greens—sit at the intersection of several high-risk factors:

  • They are grown in open environments, often close to soil, surface water, and wildlife.
  • They are typically consumed raw, with no kill step.
  • They are harvested and processed at scale, meaning a single contamination event can affect large volumes.

Once STEC is introduced—through irrigation water, soil amendments, animal intrusion, or cross-contamination during harvest—it can persist through processing and distribution.

A Trend Driven by Systemic Exposure, Not One-Off Failures

Looking at the long-term pattern, the rise in STEC incidents linked to leafy greens appears gradual and sustained, not erratic. This points less to individual breakdowns and more to ongoing exposure points that are difficult to fully control in field-grown produce.

Several underlying drivers are likely reinforcing the trend:

  • Climate variability is increasing pressure on water sources, leading to greater reliance on surface water and alternative irrigation systems.
  • Expanded surveillance and testing now capture non-O157 STEC that were historically under-detected.
  • Supply chains are longer, more consolidated, and faster—reducing time to intervene once contamination occurs.

In other words, the risk profile of leafy greens has not dramatically changed overnight; the visibility of that risk has.

This insight has been timely identified and is available to users through the SGS Digicomply Food Safety Intelligence Hub. Feel free to explore the Food Safety Intelligence Hub demo and try this tool in action.

Where These Incidents Are Being Reported

The geographic distribution of incidents is heavily skewed toward North America, with the United States clearly leading, followed by Canada. Several European countries appear at lower levels, with occasional reports from Asia-Pacific regions.

This does not necessarily mean STEC incidents are rare elsewhere. Instead, it reflects where detection, reporting, and public disclosure are most systematic. Countries with mature surveillance systems, strong recall frameworks, and mandatory public communication will always appear more frequently in official datasets.

What Type of Incidents Dominate

Most recorded events fall into recalls and regulatory controls, rather than consumer complaints. Outbreaks are also a significant category, indicating that many incidents are identified only after illnesses are detected.

This distribution suggests that STEC in leafy greens is often discovered late in the chain, sometimes after products have reached consumers. The dominance of recalls underscores the scale at which contamination events occur once they escape early controls.

An Important Caveat: These Are Only Official Government Reports

It is critical to note that this analysis is based exclusively on incidents reported by government bodies. That means:

  • No private testing data
  • No internal company investigations
  • No unreported market withdrawals

What we see here is the minimum confirmed footprint of the issue. The actual number of STEC contamination events—especially those resolved quietly before regulatory notification—is almost certainly higher.

What to Expect Next

There is little indication that this trend will reverse in the near term. If anything, several developments suggest continued pressure:

  • Broader inclusion of non-O157 STEC in regulatory testing programs
  • More aggressive environmental monitoring expectations
  • Greater scrutiny of water quality and pre-harvest controls
  • Lower tolerance for repeated contamination linked to specific regions or suppliers

For leafy greens, STEC is no longer an episodic food safety concern—it is a persistent hazard that regulators expect to see actively managed, not reactively addressed.

The data does not point to panic, but it does point to normalization of STEC risk in leafy greens, with recalls and controls becoming part of the operating reality rather than exceptional events.

For food safety teams, the real signal is not the number of incidents in any given year—but the fact that the line keeps going up.