Login Get in touch
Digicomply Insights

PPWR and the End of Single-Use Packaging: How the Game Will Change by 2030

September 3 2025 • By SGS Digicomply Editorial Team • 16 min read

Subscribe Now

From supermarket shopping to take-away meals, consumers today encounter an abundance of disposable wrappers, bags, and containers – most of which are used only once. This "use-and-toss" model has serious environmental consequences,...

From supermarket shopping to take-away meals, consumers today encounter an abundance of disposable wrappers, bags, and containers – most of which are used only once. This "use-and-toss" model has serious environmental consequences, prompting regulators to take bold action. In Europe, for example, 40% of all plastics are used just for packaging, and packaging waste accounts for roughly half of the litter in our oceans. On average, each EU citizen generated about 180–189 kg of packaging waste in a single year (2021/2022) – a number that has been rising steadily. If no measures were taken, the EU projected its packaging waste would climb by another 19% by 2030, with plastic packaging waste surging by 46%. Clearly, this trajectory is unsustainable for the planet and for society.

To reverse these trends, governments and industries are moving to end the era of single-use packaging. A landmark step is the European Union's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), adopted in 2024, which aims to dramatically reshape how food and other goods are packaged this decade. By 2030, the "game" of packaging will change fundamentally – shifting away from throwaway plastics toward a circular model centered on reuse, recyclability, and sustainability. This horizon-scanning article explores what the PPWR is, why single-use packaging is being targeted, and how the food sector is gearing up for a new normal by 2030. We will also address common questions business leaders might have (for SEO, we've phrased key points as questions) and provide insight into the future of packaging in developed markets.

What Is the PPWR and What Are Its 2030 Goals?

The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) is the European Union's ambitious legislation designed to overhaul packaging across its member states. Replacing the older 1994 directive, the PPWR entered into force in early 2025 and will start applying by mid-2026. Its core vision is that by 2030 all packaging placed on the EU market must be reusable or recyclable in an economically viable way. In practice, this means every food package – from a soda bottle to a snack wrapper – should be designed so it can either be reused multiple times or efficiently recycled instead of ending up as waste.

To drive this transformation, the PPWR sets concrete targets and requirements leading up to 2030 and beyond:

Waste Reduction Targets: EU countries must cut packaging waste per capita by 5% by 2030 (and further to 10% by 2035 and 15% by 2040, relative to 2018 levels). While 5% may seem modest, it reverses the growth trend and is equivalent to a 37% reduction versus a no-action scenario by 2040. The goal is to prevent waste in the first place by eliminating excess packaging and encouraging reuse.

Universal Recyclability: By 2030, all packaging should be recyclable. The regulation will introduce strict design-for-recycling standards, such as mandating that packaging use materials and formats that can achieve high recycling rates. In fact, only packaging that achieves at least a 70% recyclability rate (rated class A, B or C) will be allowed on the market from 2030. This pushes companies to phase out hard-to-recycle formats (for example, multi-layered plastic films or foils that can't be separated).

Reuse and Refill Quotas: The PPWR brings back the old idea of the milkman, but updated for the 21st century. It sets binding reuse targets for various product categories by 2030, meaning a share of products must be sold in reusable packaging. For instance, at least 10% of beverages (alcoholic and non-alcoholic) should be offered in reusable bottles or containers by 2030, with that quota rising to 40% by 2040. Likewise, restaurants, cafés and take-away food services are expected to adopt refillable or returnable container options for their products. Reuse is a major pillar of the new rules, intended to break the dependence on single-use disposables.

Recycled Content Requirements: To support a circular economy, the regulation mandates that new packaging include a minimum amount of recycled material. For example, food-grade PET plastic packaging must contain at least 30% recycled content by 2030, and single-use plastic drink bottles also need 30% recycled plastic by 2030 (ramping up to 65% by 2040). These targets create a market demand for recycled plastics and reduce reliance on virgin (new) plastics.

Harmonized Labeling and Standards: By 2030, consumers will see new standardized recycling labels on packaging across the EU. Packaging will have to clearly indicate its material composition and how to dispose of it (recycle, compost, etc.), possibly via easily recognized symbols or QR codes. This uniform labeling is meant to reduce confusion and improve recycling rates. In addition, the EU will develop harmonized technical standards for packaging recyclability and reusability, so that companies across Europe design to the same rulebook.

In summary, the PPWR's 2030 vision is to minimize packaging waste at the source, boost reuse systems, and ensure any remaining packaging is 100% recyclable and partly made from recycled content. It is a cornerstone of the EU's Green Deal and Circular Economy Action Plan, intended to "make sustainable products the norm". While these are EU rules, their impact is global – many multinational food companies will likely apply similar changes to their packaging worldwide, and other developed markets are enacting parallel policies (more on that later).

Why Is Single-Use Packaging Being Targeted?

Single-use packaging – the throwaway wrappers, bags, cups, and containers that are discarded after one use – is a prime target because of its outsized environmental footprint. The food industry relies heavily on single-use plastics and other disposables for convenience and hygiene, but this convenience comes at a cost:

Soaring Waste and Pollution: As noted earlier, packaging waste in Europe jumped over 20% in the last decade. Without intervention, it would keep rising nearly 20% more by 2030. This trend translates into mountains of trash in landfills and enormous quantities of litter. Plastic packaging is especially problematic – it is often not recycled (only about 41% of plastic packaging waste in the EU is recycled), and the rest can persist in the environment for centuries. In fact, estimates show packaging waste comprises about half of all marine litter (by item count). We've all seen the images of snack bags and drink bottles polluting beaches and oceans. Cutting down single-use packaging is seen as crucial to reducing this flow of pollution.

Resource and Carbon Intensity: Single-use packaging consumes a huge volume of raw materials and energy only to be quickly thrown away. 40% of plastics and 50% of paper produced in the EU are used for packaging that often has a lifespan of mere days or weeks. This linear "take-make-dispose" model contributes to deforestation (for paper/cardboard), depletes fossil fuels (for plastics), and generates significant greenhouse gas emissions in production. By one estimate, the new EU measures on packaging will significantly cut GHG emissions and water use by 2030 due to reduced virgin material consumption. In other words, moving away from single-use packaging helps fight climate change and conserves resources.

Consumer Frustration and Demand for Change: There is also a social component. Consumers are increasingly frustrated with excessive packaging – like opening a box only to find another box and layers of plastic for a small item. Many are demanding less wasteful, more eco-friendly packaging. The PPWR explicitly aims to "get rid of unnecessary packaging and limit over-packaging" to address these concerns. Younger demographics in particular are embracing zero-waste shopping and bring-your-own-container habits. Regulators and brands know that ignoring these expectations could be a business risk, as eco-conscious consumers vote with their wallets.

Microplastic and Health Concerns: Plastic packaging not only pollutes visibly but also breaks down into microplastics that enter soils, waterways, and even our food chain. There is growing evidence of microplastics in food and drinking water due to plastic waste. Furthermore, some packaging contains hazardous chemicals (for example, certain inks, glues, or PFAS "forever chemicals" used as grease-proof linings) that can leach into food or the environment. The PPWR takes aim at these too – for instance, it will ban packaging containing PFAS above very low thresholds by 2026 to protect health and prevent persistent toxins. Overall, the drive to end single-use packaging is also about making food packaging safer and non-toxic.

In short, single-use packaging in the food sector has become emblematic of our throwaway culture – contributing disproportionately to waste, pollution, and resource depletion. By focusing on eliminating or reinventing these disposables, policymakers hope to spark systemic change toward sustainability. The next question is: how exactly will that change happen by 2030? Let's look at what the new rules entail for phasing out single-use packaging.

What Single-Use Packaging Will Be Phased Out by 2030?

Under the PPWR and related initiatives, many common single-use packaging formats in the food and hospitality industry will be restricted or outright banned by 2030. The aim is to eliminate those disposable items deemed most unnecessary or easily replaceable with reusable alternatives. Here are the key single-use packaging items on the chopping block:

Plastic Packaging for Fresh Produce: If you're used to buying fruits and vegetables wrapped in plastic trays or film, expect a change. By 2030, single-use plastic packaging for most fresh produce will be banned in the EU. Specifically, the rule targets pre-packed fruits and vegetables under 1.5 kg, since these can often be sold loose or in more sustainable packaging. So, those plastic tubs of cherry tomatoes or shrink-wrapped cucumbers will likely disappear, encouraging a return to bulk bins or compostable alternatives. (The intent is to cut waste without compromising food hygiene or shelf life – some delicate produce might get exemptions, but the direction is clear: no more routine plastic wrap on produce.)

Single-Use Packaging for Dine-In Food and Beverages: Perhaps the biggest change will come to restaurants, cafés, and bars. The new rules ban single-use packaging for food and drinks consumed on-site at eateries. This means when you sit down at a fast-food restaurant or coffee shop in 2030, you shouldn't be served your meal in a throwaway paper box or your coffee in a disposable cup. Instead, dine-in orders must use reusable plates, cups, and cutlery (or serve items without any packaging when possible). No more disposable burger wrappers, cups, or sachets for in-house dining – these establishments will need to switch to durable serveware that can be washed and reused. This rule essentially ends the era of "single-use convenience" for on-premises consumption, which is a significant shift for the food service sector.

Mini Portion Packs (Condiment Sachets, etc.): Those little single-use packets of ketchup, mayonnaise, sugar, creamers, and other condiments are also on their way out. By 2030, individual single-use portion packets for sauces, dressings, sugar, and similar items will no longer be allowed in hotels, restaurants and cafés. These are ubiquitous in the hospitality industry but are a major source of small plastic waste (think of the millions of ketchup sachets tossed daily). The ban means restaurants will need to provide condiments in reusable containers – e.g. refillable bottles or dispensers – rather than handing out tiny disposable packets. Similarly, single-serve butter or jam tubs at breakfast buffets would be replaced by communal dishes or other reusable solutions. This change not only cuts plastic waste but also reduces litter (since sachets easily escape into the environment).

"Very Lightweight" Plastic Bags: The EU has been cracking down on plastic shopping bags for years, and the PPWR will finish the job. By January 2030, very lightweight plastic carrier bags (the flimsy kind often used for produce or bakery items) are set to be banned. Many countries already banned thicker grocery bags; this targets the remaining thin bags that were sometimes exempted. In grocery stores, instead of those thin plastic produce bags, you may need to bring your own reusable produce bags or use paper-based ones. This measure complements earlier directives and will virtually end single-use plastic bags in the food retail sector, encouraging consumers to "BYOB – Bring Your Own Bag."

Other Unnecessary Single-Use Formats: Beyond the food-specific items above, the EU is also eliminating some single-use packaging in other contexts by 2030 – underscoring the broad move away from disposables. For example, miniature toiletry bottles in hotels (the tiny shampoo and soap bottles) are being phased out, as are plastic wraps used for luggage at airports. While not food-related, these bans illustrate the overall philosophy: if a single-use item is avoidable, find a reusable or no-packaging solution. In the food sector, we can extrapolate this ethos further – any superfluous layers of packaging or non-recyclable materials are under scrutiny.

It's important to note that not every single piece of single-use packaging will vanish overnight in 2030, but the landscape will fundamentally shift. Some disposable packaging will still exist (especially for take-away and retail food where reuse is harder), but it will be much more regulated, standardized, and limited to cases of real necessity. Moreover, any disposable packaging that remains is likely to be made of recyclable and safer materials as required by the new law. The ultimate goal is that by 2030 we say goodbye to the most wasteful single-use items and never look back. (One caveat: simply switching from a plastic disposable to a paper disposable is not seen as a complete solution. NGOs caution that "single-use paper packaging is still single-use" and can be just as wasteful. So the PPWR prioritizes reusable packaging options over any kind of one-time-use material. We'll explore reuse next.)

How Will Reusable and Refillable Packaging Become the New Normal?

A cornerstone of the 2030 packaging vision is a resurgence of reusable and refillable packaging in the food sector. After decades of dominance by disposables, businesses and consumers will need to embrace the "new normal" of reuse. Here's how the PPWR and market trends are fostering a rebirth of reusables:

Reuse Targets for Industry: The regulation requires companies to gradually offer more of their products in reusable packaging. As mentioned, by 2030 at least 10% of beverage sales should be in reusable containers (think beer or soda in refillable bottles). Other categories like take-away food and e-commerce deliveries also have reuse obligations – companies must offer a certain percentage of their take-away meals or online grocery orders in reusable packaging formats by 2030. This could mean, for example, a restaurant chain has a program where customers can opt for a deposit-return reusable lunchbox, or an online grocer delivers in reusable crates that they pick up later. While some sectors have exceptions (e.g. small businesses and certain products got temporary carve-outs), the overall trend is clear: reusable packaging is coming back in a big way.

Standardization and Convenience: For reuse to scale up, it must be convenient and standardized. The PPWR encourages the standardization of reusable packaging formats and systems. This could involve uniform designs (for instance, common glass bottle shapes that multiple beverage brands can use and return), as well as interoperable return schemes (so a customer can return a container at any participating store, not just where they bought it). The regulation also calls for clear labeling of reusable packaging – packages that are meant to be returned/reused will be marked as such, so consumers know what to do. We may see digital tracking (QR codes or apps) that help manage deposits and returns for reusables, making the process smooth. By 2030, using a deposit-return coffee cup or a refillable detergent bottle should be as easy as recycling a bottle is today.

Refill Stations and BYO Containers: Another big change is the push to allow and encourage refilling. Under the new rules, take-away and retail businesses must accommodate consumers bringing their own containers (BYO) for food and drinks. For example, a café can't refuse to fill a customer's reusable mug or lunchbox and cannot charge extra for it – by law, they have to make it an option at no additional cost. In supermarkets, we'll also see more refill stations for foods and beverages. In fact, large grocery stores (over 400 m² floor space) are required to dedicate at least 10% of their sales area to refill stations by 2030. This means more dispensers for items like cereals, pasta, nuts, snacks, or even liquids (milk, juices, oils) where you can fill your own container. Bulk sections, which were niche in the past, could become mainstream by the end of the decade.

Deposit-Return Systems (DRS): To ensure reusable (and recyclable) beverage containers are returned, the PPWR calls for expanding deposit-return schemes across the EU. By 2030, consumers in many countries will pay a small deposit on drink bottles and cans, which they get back when they return the empties. These systems, already in place in some European nations, greatly increase collection rates (often above 90%). While deposit systems primarily exist to boost recycling, they also support reuse if glass bottles or sturdy plastics are cleaned and refilled. We can expect a deposit on more types of beverage packaging by 2030 – possibly including wine and spirits bottles – creating a strong incentive to bring containers back rather than trash them.

Innovation in Reusable Packaging Services: The private sector is responding with new solutions to make reuse convenient. We see startups offering subscription models for reusable packaging (e.g. services where you "borrow" a cup and drop it off at a kiosk later). Some major brands are trialing "packaging-as-a-service" concepts – for instance, selling products in durable containers that consumers can return via mail or pickup for reuse. By 2030, such systems might be common for things like meal deliveries or pantry staples, enabled by apps that track your returns. The EU rules don't mandate the exact model, but by setting targets they spur companies to innovate ways to meet them.

Crucially, the push for reusables isn't happening in isolation; it's accompanied by consumer education and culture change. The idea is that within a few years, habits like carrying a reusable shopping bag, traveling with a refillable water bottle, or using a deposit cup will be second nature to most people (much like recycling bins became normal in the past decades). Public awareness campaigns and the sheer visibility of reuse options will help drive this culture shift.

It's worth noting that reusables also need to be well-managed to truly be beneficial (they must be reused enough times to offset the resources used to make and wash them). Regulators will likely refine standards on this – ensuring, for example, that reusable containers are durable and safe for repeated use, and possibly setting up centralized facilities for cleaning and redistribution in urban areas. By 2030, the infrastructure supporting a circular packaging economy – from washing facilities to reverse logistics for collecting used containers – will have expanded significantly to meet the demand.

Will "Recyclable" Mean Truly Recycled? (Designing All Packaging for Circularity)

Even with a big increase in reuse, not all packaging can or will be reusable by 2030. Many food products (like a candy bar or a bag of chips) will likely still use single-use packaging for practicality and hygiene. However, the difference in 2030 is that any single-use packaging that remains must be part of a circular loop, not the dead-end waste stream we have today. The PPWR and related laws tackle this by overhauling packaging design and end-of-life handling:

Strict Design for Recyclability: As mentioned, by 2030 all packaging must be recyclable in an economically viable way. The EU is developing rigorous criteria to define this. For example, packaging might need to be made of monomaterials or easily separable materials so that recycling facilities can actually process them. Multi-layer or composite packaging (like those foil-lined plastic snack wrappers or juice cartons with plastic + aluminum + paper) are problematic today – they often end up as unrecyclable waste. The new rules push companies to simplify materials and avoid hard-to-recycle combinations. If a package can't achieve a high recycling rate (remember the A, B, C rating concept), it will be phased out. This essentially forces the industry to innovate packaging that can be collected and reborn as new packaging, not burned or landfilled. We're already seeing companies respond – for instance, some brands are switching from plastic-heavy packaging to paper-based designs with minimal plastic that can be recycled as cardboard. Others are exploring monomaterial pouches and new polymers that are easier to recycle. By 2030, the average food package should be much more recycling-friendly than today's packaging.

Mandatory Recycling Systems: Hand in hand with design changes, the EU is pushing for better collection and recycling systems so that recyclable packaging actually gets recycled. We mentioned deposit-return for bottles (which ensures high return rates). Additionally, there will be requirements for separate collection of packaging waste and possibly higher recycling targets for each material. The PPWR doesn't directly set new recycling percentage targets (those exist in other waste laws), but it creates conditions to meet and exceed them. By improving labeling and consistency (so consumers know exactly how to sort each package), the hope is to reduce the confusion that often leads to recyclables being thrown in the trash. Some countries might even implement "packaging return" programs for certain types of packaging beyond bottles – e.g. returning used coffee pods or flexible plastic wraps to stores for recycling. The overarching goal is a closed-loop system where the materials from packaging are recovered and reused in new packaging, reducing the need for virgin materials.

Recycled Content Loops: The requirement to include recycled content in new packaging (30% in many cases by 2030) is a game-changer because it creates a market pull for collected recyclables. For example, if every yogurt cup or water bottle must have at least 30% recycled plastic, manufacturers will actively source recycled resin – making recycling economically worthwhile. This should spur investment in better recycling technology and capacity. It also means that by 2030, consumers might see more packaging that proudly notes "made with X% recycled material," which can reinforce the recycling habit. The loop looks like this: you recycle a plastic food tray today, that plastic gets reprocessed and by 2030 becomes part of a new food tray, and so on. By mandating recycled content, the EU essentially ensures that recycling isn't just "downcycling" to lower-grade uses, but feeding back into high-quality food packaging where possible.

Cutting Down on Over-Packaging: Another aspect of circular design is simply using less material and eliminating empty space. The PPWR includes provisions to minimize empty air in e-commerce boxes and grouped packaging – for example, from 2030 any shipping box should not have more than 50% empty space. This will likely lead to more right-sized packaging, compressible packaging, or creative solutions like reusable shipping containers for groceries. For food manufacturers, expect pressure to remove things like double packaging (e.g., a bag of snacks inside a box) unless absolutely necessary. Reducing material usage directly lowers waste generated.

Safer Materials and Compostables: While recycling is the priority, in some cases compostable or bio-based packaging might be allowed (for items that are hard to recycle or often food-soiled, like tea bags or fruit stickers). The EU is defining where biodegradable or compostable packaging makes sense and ensuring those materials actually break down properly. By 2030 we might see compostable solutions used in niche areas (for instance, compostable films for produce), but they will be clearly labeled and used only where they truly benefit the environment. Importantly, any compostable items can't be an excuse to litter – the rules emphasize they "must be directed to specific applications" and not give a license to litter. So even if something is biodegradable, the preferred path is still to collect and compost it in controlled facilities. Overall, packaging materials in 2030 will be less toxic (thanks to bans on hazardous substances like PFAS and limits on others) and more environmentally benign across their life cycle.

In essence, by 2030 the default for packaging will be circularity. If it's single-use, it must be recyclable and largely recycled; if it's not recyclable, it shouldn't be on the market. This marks the end of the line for a lot of legacy packaging types (certain foams, PVC plastics, multi-material pouches, etc., will be relics of the past). For companies in the food sector, this means R&D in packaging is booming – we're seeing new designs like plastic-free coated papers, easily recyclable mono-plastic pouches, edible coatings, and more. Many of these innovations will hit shelves leading up to 2030, changing the look and feel of products but in the service of sustainability.

How Will the Food Industry Adapt (Challenges and Opportunities)?

The impending end of single-use packaging as we know it is both a challenge and an opportunity for food businesses. On one hand, companies must overcome practical hurdles – redesigning packaging, altering supply chains, and investing in new systems. On the other hand, those that innovate early can gain a competitive edge and win consumer trust in a world hungry for sustainable solutions. Here's what adaptation looks like, and how the "game change" by 2030 will impact various players:

Packaging Redesign and Innovation: Food manufacturers are already hard at work rethinking how they package products. By 2030, every product's packaging needs a sustainability makeover. This can be complex – for example, finding a recyclable film to keep chips crisp, or developing a sturdy reusable container for takeaway sushi. Companies are testing alternatives like bioplastic liners, fiber-based bottles, glass or stainless-steel refillable containers, and minimalist packaging. Expect to see a wave of packaging innovation labs and partnerships with packaging tech startups. Major brands have announced goals aligned with or exceeding the PPWR (some committed to 100% recyclable or reusable packaging by 2025 or 2030). Many have also joined initiatives to standardize reusable packaging in certain sectors (for instance, a consortium standardizing refillable bottles). An early adaptation example: some beverage firms are expanding their beer/soda bottle reuse programs and touting new bottle designs optimized for multiple trips. Others are introducing concentrated products (like drink syrups or powders) to reduce packaging volume. The ones who crack the code on maintaining product quality with less or reusable packaging will reap benefits and set industry best practices.

Supply Chain and Operational Changes: Switching to reusables and managing returns means changes beyond the packaging itself. Logistics systems need to handle reverse flows – e.g., trucks bringing new products to stores might take back empties for cleaning. Washing and refurbishing facilities for reusable containers become a part of the supply chain. Companies might partner with specialized service providers for this (already, firms that offer to collect, wash, and redistribute reusable packaging are emerging). Inventory management also changes when packaging itself is reused (packaging becomes an asset to track). Additionally, sourcing enough recycled materials to meet content mandates is a concern – companies are signing contracts with recycling firms and investing in recycling infrastructure to secure supply of food-grade recycled plastics. This vertical integration is new territory for many food businesses. By 2030, the industry may look a bit more like the beverage sector did in the past – with networks for collecting and reusing bottles – but at a larger scale and with digital tracing.

Compliance and Reporting: The PPWR introduces extended producer responsibility (EPR) requirements and reporting obligations. Producers will have to register packaging and pay fees based on the environmental impact (higher fees for packaging that's hard to recycle, for example). This incentivizes better design – choose a design that is easier to recycle, and your fees are lower. For many companies, this means integrating sustainability criteria into packaging design decisions at the outset (a financial officer will care about that packaging fee!). There will also be more reporting and transparency – companies might need to disclose how much packaging they put on the market and how much is recycled. Non-compliance isn't an option; regulators in 2030 will be closely monitoring progress, and companies that fall short could face penalties or public scrutiny.

Cost Implications: In the short term, developing new packaging and setting up reuse systems can increase costs. Reusable packaging often has a higher upfront cost per unit than disposables (though it pays off over multiple uses), and establishing return logistics requires investment. Some of these costs may be passed to consumers (for example, a small deposit on a reusable cup, or a slightly higher price for a sustainably packaged product). The PPWR acknowledges this trade-off, noting that initially the price of reusable packaging might be higher. However, over time, economies of scale and waste savings should balance things out. Companies that move early could actually save money in the long run – by reducing the amount of raw material they purchase (less single-use material), by avoiding future plastic taxes or waste levies, and by building brand loyalty among eco-conscious customers. Also, consider the cost of doing nothing: if linear packaging systems continued, companies might face ever-increasing waste management fees and risk losing customers who demand sustainability.

Consumer Interaction and Brand Image: From a marketing perspective, adapting to the end of single-use packaging can be a win. Brands are seizing the chance to market their eco-friendly packaging initiatives, which can attract customers and satisfy investors focused on ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) metrics. By 2030, packaging will be a visible marker of sustainability – consumers will notice if your product comes in a refillable jar vs. a throwaway pouch. Early adopters already label their packaging with messages about recyclability or reuse to differentiate themselves. There's also a need to educate consumers: companies might need to run campaigns on "How to return our reusable bottles" or "Our new package looks different but here's how to recycle it". Those who manage to make the transition user-friendly and clearly communicate it will build goodwill. On the flip side, any company dragging its feet may face backlash (imagine being one of the last brands still using non-recyclable packaging in 2030 – it would be a PR nightmare).

Challenges for SMEs: Smaller food producers and restaurants might find the transition challenging due to fewer resources. The PPWR does offer some flexibility for small businesses (e.g. certain reuse rules may not apply to the smallest companies initially). Nonetheless, even SMEs will feel the pressure from consumers and supply chain partners to improve packaging. Many will likely adopt off-the-shelf solutions provided by packaging suppliers who develop compliant packaging for them. For a small cafe, it could mean joining a city-wide cup return program run by a third party, rather than setting up their own. For a regional food producer, it might mean buying new packaging materials that meet recyclability standards set by law. Industry associations are expected to help their members navigate these changes. By 2030, being a small player won't be an excuse for unsustainable packaging – fortunately, the costs of sustainable options should come down as they become standard.

Opportunities and New Business Models: The shake-up in packaging is also opening new business opportunities. Companies specializing in sustainable packaging design, compostable materials, or reusable container logistics are in high demand. The "packaging revolution" could create new jobs in recycling tech, reusable packaging circulation, and materials science. For the food sector, it's an opportunity to rethink product formats entirely – for example, selling more products in concentrated or dehydrated form (less packaging) or leveraging Internet of Things (IoT) tech for smart reusable containers that track freshness and usage. Retailers might attract customers with the promise of a zero-waste shopping experience, differentiating themselves in a competitive market. Sustainability can drive innovation that not only reduces waste but also improves product delivery (consider how milk home-delivery in reusable bottles could make a comeback – convenient and zero waste). The companies that embrace these innovations could capture a growing segment of eco-conscious consumers.

In summary, adapting to a low-waste packaging world by 2030 is a significant transformation for the food industry. It won't be without growing pains, but it's also a necessary evolution. Those food businesses that start early, experiment, and learn will likely find themselves thriving in the new game – with leaner operations, closer customer engagement, and a brand that stands for responsibility. And importantly, they'll be compliant with regulations, avoiding any last-minute scrambles when the 2030 deadlines hit.

Are Other Countries Also Ending Single-Use Packaging?

While the PPWR is a flagship initiative in Europe, it is part of a broader global trend in developed markets to curb single-use packaging and promote sustainability. Around the world, regulators are responding to the packaging waste crisis with their own targets and bans, often inspired by or in parallel to the EU's actions. Here are a few examples:

United States (State-Level Action): The U.S. doesn't have a single federal packaging law like the PPWR, but several states are forging ahead. California's SB 54 (2022) mandates that 100% of plastic packaging be recyclable or compostable by 2032, and requires a 25% reduction in plastic packaging by 2030. California also set ambitious recycling rates and is implementing EPR fees for producers – a framework not unlike Europe's. States like Maine and Oregon have passed extended producer responsibility laws that make packaging producers fund recycling programs. Dozens of U.S. states have banned single-use plastic bags, and some cities have bans or fees on single-use food containers and cups. While patchwork, these moves show a trajectory similar to the EU's: by 2030, many parts of the U.S. will have significantly tightened rules on packaging, especially plastics.

Canada: Canada has launched a comprehensive plan to achieve zero plastic waste by 2030. It already banned certain single-use plastic items (straws, cutlery, checkout bags, etc.) in 2023. Canada is also eyeing recycled content requirements for plastic packaging and better recycling systems nationwide. The ethos is comparable to the EU – reduce disposables, improve recyclability, and keep plastics in the economy and out of the environment.

Japan: Japan, known for heavy packaging of food products, has strengthened its Containers and Packaging Recycling Law. It emphasizes producer responsibility and recycling targets for plastics, glass, and paper. Japan is also promoting biomaterials and has programs to reduce plastic bag usage (a small fee on bags nationwide). By 2030, we might see Japan leveraging its technological edge to improve recycling processes and perhaps introducing more refill models in its convenience stores and supermarkets.

China: China made headlines by enacting a sweeping Plastic Ban that, among other things, prohibits non-degradable plastic bags in major cities and phased out single-use plastic straws nationally. By the end of 2025, non-degradable plastic packaging is banned in certain sectors (like postal services in major cities). They are pushing alternatives and recycled content as well. So by 2030, even in China – the world's largest plastic producer – single-use plastics in many food-related applications will be heavily reduced.

Australia: Through the Australian Packaging Covenant, Australia set 2025 national packaging targets, including 100% of packaging being recyclable, reusable or compostable by 2025, and 50% average recycled content in packaging. Several Australian states banned single-use plastic bags and are moving on straws and foam containers. While some targets (2025) are very near-term, by 2030 Australia aims to have a circular packaging economy well on track, much like Europe.

Other Regions: In the EU's neighboring UK, similar moves are afoot – bans on certain single-use plastics, a planned deposit return scheme for bottles, and discussions of EPR for packaging. The UK's big brands also have 2025/2030 goals for recyclability and recycled content, mirroring EU goals. In Latin America, countries like Chile and Brazil have introduced EPR laws and plastic restrictions. Many developing countries too (e.g., India, several African nations) have banned specific single-use plastics like bags or styrofoam food containers, recognizing the pollution issues.

The common thread globally is a recognition that single-use packaging, especially plastics, must be reined in. The EU's PPWR is among the most comprehensive frameworks, and it may set a de facto standard – multinational companies might apply PPWR principles across all their markets for consistency. It won't be surprising if by 2030, terms like "reusable packaging", "recyclable packaging only", and "plastic ban" are part of policy lexicon in most developed economies. We're essentially witnessing the beginning of the end for throwaway packaging worldwide, not just in Europe.

Of course, different regions have different timelines – some may move faster, others slower. But consumer awareness of packaging waste has never been higher everywhere, and major international brands have made global pledges (through alliances like the New Plastics Economy Global Commitment). These pledges often align with the 2025–2030 timeframe to eliminate problematic single-use plastics and ensure all packaging is recyclable or reusable. So even without direct regulation, the market is nudging in that direction.

For businesses operating in multiple countries, this means planning for a packaging overhaul not just in the EU but across all key markets by 2030. The writing is on the wall: whether by law or consumer expectation, single-use packaging's days are numbered.

Conclusion: The Packaging Landscape in 2030 and Beyond

By 2030, food packaging will transition from throwaway culture to circular principles:

Key Changes:

  • Reusable containers standard for dining in and increasingly for take-away/retail
  • Remaining single-use packaging will be recyclable, minimalist materials (monomaterial films, sustainable paper)
  • Excessive packaging eliminated
  • Bulk shopping with personal containers becomes normal

Business Impact: Food companies will integrate sustainability across all operations - marketing, logistics, finance. Early adopters gain competitive advantage.

Regulatory Evolution: 2030 is a milestone, not endpoint. Beyond 2030: higher reuse quotas by 2040, 65% recycled content in bottles, climate-neutral packaging by 2050.

Benefits: Less litter, reduced waste, lower resource consumption, convenient standardized systems.

Bottom Line: The PPWR ends the linear throwaway model. Companies that adapt will lead; those that don't will fall behind in compliance and customer preference. This shift is already underway across all stakeholders.

Tags: regulatory compliance, horizon scanning, Food Packaging, PPWR

    

Blog Updates to Your Inbox!

Blog Updates
Food Safety Dashboard 1 (1)

All-in-one Food Safety & Regulatory Compliance platform

SGS Digicomply is a collaborative AI-Platform providing real-time monitoring, predictive risk management, and regulatory compliance for streamlined market entry and quicker time to market

Explore platform